Sarelson Law Firm

Is Google Guilty of Antitrust Violations?

January 27th, 2012

After Google unveiled its new feature known as “Search Plus Your World”, some antitrust experts are worried that the search giant has stepped over the line.

Google’s new search tailors its results to individual users by using Google’s social network, Google+. When used, the new search contains results from Google+ posts and profiles. Absent from the results are anything from the much larger Twitter and Facebook.

“Google runs a very high risk of being found in violation of antitrust and competition laws,” said Ted Henneberry, a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe’s antitrust group. “The issue raised by Google’s new announcement is how it potentially increases its dominance and furthers its discriminatory treatment of rivals.”

Google defends itself by saying that users benefit from Search Plus Your World, and points out that the company has no legal obligation to boost its rivals’ services.

“The laws are designed to help consumers benefit from innovation, not to help competitors,” said Adam Kovacevich, a spokesman for Google.

The difficulty with Google’s position, though, is that it can most likely be defined as a monopoly. With control of over two-thirds of the U.S. search market, experts say it is legally within the realm of monopoly.

We wonder whether anyone will pursue Google on antitrust violations, and if so, what the result will be.

Sarelson Law Firm – Miami litigation attorneys

 

Google and Twitter Argue Over Relevancy

January 26th, 2012

A running argument is going on between Google and Twitter over how relevant Google’s search results are.

Google+ pages are showing up more frequently in the company’s search results. Some are arguing the company is pushing its social network through its search engine. Twitter argues that, by preferring Google+ results, Google is not providing the most relevant social search results. Google’s response to this accusation is that Twitter does not provide Google with adequate permission to do so.

Twitter’s counsel, Alex Macgillivray, tweeted an example of Google’s new results that attempted to prove Google’s inefficiency. Using the “@” symbol, he searched for the term “@WWE”, which did not yield the organization’s Twitter page.

Google responded that it has never indexed the “@” symbol, which means the company has never recognized a Twitter handle when it was formatted that way.

Searching for “WWE Twitter” yields the organization’s Twitter page before Google+ results and “@WWE” gives the same results as a search for “WWE”. Searching for “+WWE” brings up a Google+ profile.

As mashable.com points out, it is strange that in five years Google has never acknowledged Twitter handles. It also points out, though, that both Twitter and Facebook have not made it easy for the search engine to delve into their websites.

What does this mean for consumer protection? Consumers expect the most relevant results from Google, not the results that Google prefers. Time will show which is more important to the company.

Sarelson Law Firm – Miami litigation attorneys

 

Twitter Responds o Changes at Google

January 25th, 2012

With Google shifting its search results around, alarm bells have gone off over at Twitter. Twitter spokesman Matt Graves has released a statement explaining exactly what the company thinks is wrong with Google’s move:

“For years, people have relied on Google to deliver the most relevant results anytime they wanted to find something on the Internet.

“Often, they want to know more about world events and breaking news. Twitter has emerged as a vital source of this real-time information, with more than 100 million users sending 240 million Tweets every day on virtually every topic. As we’ve seen time and time again, news breaks first on Twitter; as a result, Twitter accounts and Tweets are often the most relevant results.

“We’re concerned that as a result of Google’s changes, finding this information will be much harder for everyone. We think that’s bad for people, publishers, news organizations and Twitter users.”

If you are not a Twitter user, you might have been unaware just how much new information breaks on the micro blogging site. Have you experienced a change in your search results since Google made its change? Do you like the change, or even notice it?

Sarelson Law Firm – Miami litigation attorneys