Category Archives: Securities Litigation

Will the STOCK Act Address Insider Trading in Congress?

February 27th, 2012

When news stories began coming out about insider trading in Congress, many people were infuriated. Normal business people found to be guilty of insider trading face harsh penalties, so why should members of Congress not face the same? In response to public outrage, Congress passed the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act (STOCK).

The STOCK Act, in various versions, has been proposed multiple times over the years. Until now, though, members of Congress have managed to avoid applying securities laws to their own trading.

Though the STOCK Act was intended to ban congressional trading, two of the key measures that would have accomplished this were stripped away by House Majority Leader Eric Cantor. One measure would have required “political intelligence professionals” to register as lobbyists, and the other would have broadened anti-corruption law.

Political intelligence professionals are typically former members of Congress or staffers who now work for trading firms. They attempt to gain financial information from Congress to do better in the markets.

The new legislation now bars members of Congress from trading on material, non-public information learned in their official capacity, but they are still allowed to trade in areas they influence. Senate Banking Committee members, for instance, can still trade in banking.

According to CNBC, portfolios of lawmakers consistently outperform the market. It will be interesting to see if the STOCK Act affects such performance.

Sarelson Law Firm – Miami litigation attorneys

 

Posted in Securities & Investments, Securities Litigation | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Michigan Man Busted for Insider Trading

September 15th, 2011

Robert Doyle saw an opportunity and went for it. Now he is facing insider trading charges from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The 64-year-old Michigan man is accused of cashing in after an investment banker left a confidential document at Doyle’s home. The document in question was a presentation about a plan for Tyco International to buy Brink’s Home Security.

The SEC alleges that Doyle pieced together other information by following the investment banker’s activities. In 2009, the banker flew to Boca Raton, FL, the home of Tyco’s home security subsidiary ADT, on Tyco’s corporate jet. Late that year, when the bankers travel schedule changed, Doyle figured out that the deal was imminent, the SEC said.

By using his information to trade on Brinks securities, Doyle netted $88,555, according to the SEC. Doyle neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s allegations, but he did agree to give up that money with interest and pay a $44,277.50 fine.

Doyle’s lawyer declined to comment on the securities fraud lawsuit. The investment banker was not named in the SEC lawsuit.

The Sarelson Law Firm – Miami Litigation Lawyers

Posted in Securities & Investments, Securities Litigation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment